Top Nav Menu

Workplace Drug Testing in the Era of Legal Marijuana – Report Highlights

Workplace Drug Testing in the Era of Legal Marijuana – Highlights

US Map of states with legal marijuana

In March 2015, Robert L. Dupont MD of The Institue of Behavioral Health published an excellent report that all employers managing drug free workplace programs should review. The purpose of the report is to help provide some guidance to employers in an era  of chaning public opinion and fast changing states laws. 

However, if you have a short attention span like we do, it’s nice to have the Cliff’s notes version around. Here’s some of the take aways from that report.

The Challenge

As of May 2015, 23 states have passed medical marijuana laws and 4 states have approved it for use recreationally. This has caused confusion amongst employers, applicants and employees. 

  • Each state has drafted their own laws which may achieve similar results but have important nuanced differences.
  • Drug testing in the U.S. is generally categorized as “Federal” and “non-federal’ testing – with federal testing having different requirements. For example, federal testing mandates testing for marijuana where drug free workplace programs could (at risk) exclude marijuana from their testing.
  • Media regularly publishes pro-legalization drug testing related articles without providing adequate or sometimes no counterpoint comments from important organizations such as the Drug and Alcohol Testing Industry Assoc (DATIA) or American Medical Association (AMA), National Institute of Health (NIH), Department of Transportation (DOT) and other agencies.

 The Threat

Legalizing marijuana for medical or recreational purposes does not eliminate the risks it presents to safety or to a company’s bottom line. 

  • Marijuana is a psychoactive drug / mild hallucinogen
  • Marijuana is addictive to about 9% of users
  • Marijuana may increase a users vunderability to stroke
  • Even when “smoked marijuana” is provided for medical purposes is not provided using standard “dosage” standards like it is when provided as Marinol®
  • Short-term effects of marijuana use include impaired short-term memory, impaired motor coordination, altered judgment and, in high doses, paranoia and psychosis
  • There is a strong association between marijuana use and diminished lifetime achievement; motor vehicle crashes; and symptoms of chronic bronchitis

Further legalization of marijuana for medical and recreational use normalizes the use of marijuana implying to many people that its use is safe.

 The Impact of State Based Marijuana on Workplace Drug Testing

Washington DC and 23 other states have approved marijuana for medical use despite it not having been through clinical research  trials, having FDA approval or even being removed form Schedule I status. Regardless it is now seen by the public as medicine. Four states have legalized it for recreational use – directly conflicting with federal law. Some employers are now opting to remove marijuana from their testing program or are treating it as a substance with legitimate medical explaination meaning a laboratory positive could be overturned by a medical review officer if a doctor patient relationship can be verified.

The marijuana positivity rates increased 20 percent in Colorado and 23 percent in Washington. Given the upward trend in marijuana use nationally and the changing state-based laws with regard to marijuana, employers must address marijuana use in the workplace and not fall prey to the misinformation surrounding this threat to employee health and safety.

For federal drug testing programs there simply is no change. Persons testing positive for marijuana are removed from performing safety sensitive duties, may be forced to change positions, are required to engage with an substance abuse professional, have to pass a return-to-duty test and may be terminated. There is no scenario where a medical review officer would overturn a marijuana positive test even if the person had reveived a medical marijuana referral and have done so in adherance with thier local state laws.

 Advice to Employers

  • Look at the big picture: Marijuana represents a threat to safety in the workplace and to your employees health and well being. Opiate-based drugs are prescribed legally and under dosage but still represent a huge risk as does alcohol.
  • Understand the legal complications: Many states have specifically addressed marijuana in their medical marijuana laws requiring an employer to show impairment before taking action against an applicant or employee who tests positive for marijuana. These provisions should be accounted for in your drug free workplace policy.
  • Consider a per se or “Zero tolerance” policy: A zero tolerance policy can help employers avoind having to prove impairment which is where state laws can get super complicated – particularly for organizations operating in multiple states. A zero tolerance policy a strict standard of no use, period. A compoany following a zero tolerance policy would essentially be following the standard set by the federal goverment for their own regulated testing programs (DOT, Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Dept. of Defense).
  • Avoid Politically Derived Psuedoscience: In order to pass legislation, proponents of marijuana had to address the issue of driving under influence. In Washington State, they came up with an arbitrary 5ng/ml blood THC level limit to prove impairment. The problem is that THC can be consumed in a variety of ways (eating, smoking, “dabbing”/ inhailed) and enter the bloodstream at different rates over time, thus a one-off blood test does little to provide a true mesaure of impairment. According to the report “It is possible that employers who make the mistake of thinking that they will simply “mirror the state law” and use such a permissive standard for THC in blood for employees may find themselves on the wrong end of litigation down the road when employees cause injury or death after having tested positive for marijuana without being required to be drug-free as a condition of their employment.”
  • Provide Clairity in Drug Free Workplace Programs: Your workplace drug policy is the rulebook. It should clearly define the elements of the drug testing program including who is subject to testing, how testing is administered, how positive results are confirmed, and what the consequences are for positive drug test results. Supervisors and human resources staff should be trained in the employers’ substance use policies and procedures and be able to explain them to all employees and job applicants.Employers conducting workplace drug testing should provide educational opportunities for employees about substance abuse. Programs focused on wellness and/or employee assistance programs should provide education, screening and follow-up services for employees’ drug and alcohol problems. This may include return-to-work agreements provided through employee assistance programs. Provisions for assisting employees with substance use problems should be known to all employees. Encouraging employees to seek treatment confidentially, apart from a testing event, without jeopardizing their jobs is a practice that can help guide employees to recovery. As part of a drug-free workplace, an employer’s substance use policy should address employees under the influence and it should provide training to identify behaviors and related signs and symptoms of substance use.
  • Specifically Address Marijuana in the Drug Free Workplace Policy

Download the full IBH report here

AtHand Training provides awesome online training for DOT Supervisor for reasonable suspicion training and for DOT employees for drug and alcohol awareness training.

Buy now and begin training in minutes!

Buy DOT Supervisor Course

Buy DOT Employee Drug Awareness Course

Buy DFWP Supervisor Course

Buy FAA Recurring Course

DOT Supervisor Training

DOT Supervisor Training Online

DOT Compliance  

The Department of Transportation (DOT) requires federally regulated company’s employees, supervisor or otherwise, who have the ability to make a reasonable suspicion test determination be trained on 60 minutes drug and 60 minutes alcohol signs and symptoms of use and abuse. Common ways to fulfill this requirement are by video, powerpoint, in-person, or online. Each method has its benefits however training videos are generally very outdated (think 1980’s with horrible actors) and in-person training can be expensive and difficult to coordinate schedules. Online training also works well for training new supervisor’s quickly so there are no gaps between when they are trained and when they might have to make their first reasonable suspicion determination.

Record Keeping

Part of the DOT regulations state that employers are required to keep training records on hand indefinitely. One great feature of AtHandTraining’s DOT supervisor training online course is that the system automatically maintains records the training records and generates a certificate of completion for the trainee.

Recurring Training?

Most supervisors only need to complete training one-time during their employ, however the DOT would recommend that supervisors repeat the training couse every two years as best practice. FAA covered supervisors will need to repeat training every 12-18 months.

What is Reasonable Suspicion or “for cause” Drug Testing?

A DOT reasonable suspicion drug test is required when trained observer(s) believes the behaviors (physical, behavioral, mental) could reasonably be the result of the individual’s use or abuse of controlled/banned substances or if the supervisor has actual knowledge the employee has used alcohol during banned periods or controlled substances. Observations must be based on specific, contemporaneous, articulable observations concerning the appearance, behavior, speech or body odors.

For drugs, an employee would be in violation of DOT regulations if prohibited substances are detected in their system without a valid prescription or explanation – even if they are not currently impaired. This means that if an employee smoked weed during a two-week vacation they could test positive weeks after use. Alcohol testing however, tests for current impairment. 

Workplace Safety

Although it’s important to ensure employees who can make reasonable suspicion/cause determinations are trained so you can be in compliance, the underlying reason to ensure your staff are trained is to maintain a safe and secure workplace environment and ensure the safety of the general public. Every year there are reports of crashes or injuries resulting from drug or alcohol abuse related to the transportation industry. Happily, drug and alcohol abuse rates are lower in transit industries than they are in the general populations but that is likely a result of mandatory, and well-run drug and alcohol testing programs. Since supervisors are the first line of defense in the prevention of these types of accidents it’s crucial they receive the required training.

bus driver on drugs

 

 

Know and Communicate Your Policy

The DOT can change regulations from time to time and supervisors might be observing non-DOT employees under your general drug free workplace program. Therefore it’s imperitive that those who can make reasonable suspicion determinations fully understand both the DOT regualtions and your companies general drug free workplace policy. Prohibited employee conduct regarding drug and alcohol use should be clearly defined and communicated to all employees. It can be helpful to ensure the employees are also trained and have a good background knowledge of the substance abuse testing process and what’s expected of them.

DOT Regulations

Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) – 49CFR Part 382.603

§ 382.603: Training for supervisors. Each employer shall ensure that all persons designated to supervise drivers receive at least 60 minutes of training on alcohol misuse and receive at least an additional 60 minutes of training on controlled substances use. The training will be used by the supervisors to determine whether reasonable suspicion exists to require a driver to undergo testing under § 382.307. The training shall include the physical, behavioral, speech, and performance indicators of probable alcohol misuse and use of controlled substances. Recurrent training for supervisory personnel is not required.

Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) – 14 CFR Part 121 Append I & J

Drug Testing: Testing Based on Reasonable Cause. Each employer must test each employee who performs a safety-sensitive function and who is reasonably suspected of having used a prohibited drug. The decision to test must be based on a reasonable and articulable belief that the employee is using a prohibited drug on the basis of specific contemporaneous physical, behavioral, or performance indicators of probable drug use. At least two of the employee’s supervisors, one of whom is trained in detection of the symptoms of possible drug use, must substantiate and concur in the decision to test an employee who is reasonably suspected of drug use; except that in the case of an employer, other than a part 121 certificate holder, who employs 50 or fewer employees who perform safety-sensitive functions, one supervisor who is trained in detection of symptoms of possible drug use must substantiate the decision to test an employee who is reasonably suspected of drug use.

 Alcohol Reasonable Suspicion Testing: 2. The employer’s determination that reasonable suspicion exists to require the covered employee to undergo an alcohol test shall be based on specific, contemporaneous, articulable observations concerning the appearance, behavior, speech or body odors of the employee. The required observations shall be made by a supervisor who is trained in detecting the symptoms of alcohol misuse. The supervisor who makes the determination that reasonable suspicion exists shall not conduct the breath alcohol test on that employee.

Federal Transit Administration (FTA) – 49 CFR 655

655.14 Education and training programs.

Each employer shall establish an employee education and training program for all covered employees, including:

(a) Education. The education component shall include display and distribution to every covered employee of: informational material and a community service hot-line telephone number for employee assistance, if available. (b) Training—(1) Covered employees. Covered employees must receive at least 60 minutes of training on the effects and consequences of prohibited drug use on personal health, safety, and the work environment, and on the signs and symptoms that may indicate prohibited drug use. (2) Supervisors. Supervisors and/or other company officers authorized by the employer to make reasonable suspicion determinations shall receive at least 60 minutes of training on the physical, behavioral, and performance indicators of probable drug use and at least 60 minutes of training on the physical, behavioral, speech, and performance indicators of probable alcohol misuse.

Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety administration (PHMSA)

Drug Testing: (d) Testing based on reasonable cause. Each operator shall drug test each employee when there is reasonable cause to believe the employee is using a prohibited drug. The decision to test must be based on a reasonable and articulable belief that the employee is using a prohibited drug on the basis of specific, contemporaneous physical, behavioral, or performance indicators of probable drug use. At least two of the employee’s supervisors, one of whom is trained in detection of the possible symptoms of drug use, shall substantiate and concur in the decision to test an employee. The concurrence between the two supervisors may be by telephone. However, in the case of operators with 50 or fewer employees subject to testing under this part, only one supervisor of the employee trained in detecting possible drug use symptoms shall substantiate the decision to test.

Alcohol Testing: §199.241  Training for supervisors. Each operator shall ensure that persons designated to determine whether reasonable suspicion exists to require a covered employee to undergo alcohol testing under §199.225(b) receive at least 60 minutes of training on the physical, behavioral, speech, and performance indicators of probable alcohol misuse.

U.S. Coast Guard (USCG) – §16.250   Reasonable cause testing requirements

(a) The marine employer shall require any crewmember engaged or employed on board a vessel owned in the United States that is required by law or regulation to engage, employ or be operated by an individual holding a credential issued under this subchapter, who is reasonably suspected of using a dangerous drug to be chemically tested for dangerous drugs.

(b) The marine employer’s decision to test must be based on a reasonable and articulable belief that the individual has used a dangerous drug based on direct observation of specific, contemporaneous physical, behavioral, or performance indicators of probable use. Where practicable, this belief should be based on the observation of the individual by two persons in supervisory positions.

Supervisors must be given at least sixty minutes of training.

Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) – §219.300 Mandatory reasonable suspicion testing. *

(a) Requirements. (1) A railroad must require a covered employee to submit to an alcohol test when the railroad has reasonable suspicion to believe that the employee has violated any prohibition of subpart B of this part concerning use of alcohol. The railroad’s determination that reasonable suspicion exists to require the covered employee to undergo an alcohol test must be based on specific, contemporaneous, articulable observations concerning the appearance, behavior, speech or body odors of the employee.

(2) A railroad must require a covered employee to submit to a drug test when the railroad has reasonable suspicion to believe that the employee has violated the prohibitions of subpart B of this part concerning use of controlled substances. The railroad’s determination that reasonable suspicion exists to require the covered employee to undergo a drug test must be based on specific, contemporaneous, articulable observations concerning the appearance, behavior, speech or body odors of the employee. Such observations may include indications of the chronic and withdrawal effects of drugs.

(b)(1) With respect to an alcohol test, the required observations must be made by a supervisor trained in accordance with §219.11(g). The supervisor who makes the determination that reasonable suspicion exists may not conduct testing on that employee.

(2) With respect to a drug test, the required observations must be made by two supervisors, at least one of whom is trained in accordance with §219.11(g).

* Note: AtHandTraining’s DOT supervisor training course does not fulfill the 3-hour FRA requirement.

Buy One For Only $35! See Discounts For 15+

credit cards accepted

 

  • Full 2 hour course only $35!
  • DOT Compliant for any 60/60 min. DOT supervisor training for reasonable suspicion signs and symptoms. FMCSA = Yes | FAA = Yes | FTA = Yes | PHMSA = Yes | USCG = Yes
  • Company administrator can access all employee records
  • Use any mobile device, iPad or PC with any browser. Go ahead, be crazy – start on one device, finish on another!

Course topics

Intro: The Drug Free Workplace Act of 1988 | Reasonable suspicion training requirements (Regulations overview) | Record keeping | Course learning objectives

The Big Picture: The effects of substance abuse on society | The effects of substance abuse on the individual and family | The effects of substance abuse in the workplace

Drug Testing: The drug testing process & safeguards | Substance Abuse Professionals | DOT substance testing | Detection times | Refusals

Alcohol Testing:  The alcohol testing process | Evidential breath tests (EBTs) | Breath Alcohol content (BAC)

Drug Classifications & Effects of Use: Depressants | Stimulants | Hallucinogens | Other drugs of abuse (K2/Spice, Bath Salts, etc.)

The Supervisors Role:  Role overview | Confidentiality | Reasonable suspicion testing | Specific, Contemporaneous, articulable definitions w/examples

Common Use Indicators: Identifying abusers | Stereotyping | Physical symptoms | Behavioral  symptoms | Mental symptoms | Job performance | Drug paraphernalia

Intervention: Crisis vs. performance scenarios | Documentation | Enabling | Confrontation and interview | Dos and don’ts | Transportation to the collection site

Sample screenshots

athandtraining.com screenshot

Resources:

Download a free DOT Reasonable Suspicion Checklist here

 

Where Can You Find the DOT Supervisor Training Regulations?

Where Can You Find the DOT Supervisor Training Regulations?

Right here! Save yourself the Google searching…

Here’s a summary of, and links to, the federal website for the of the DOT supervisor training requirements for reasonable suspicion supervisor training by regulatory agency:

Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) – 49CFR Part 382.603

§ 382.603: Training for supervisors.

Each employer shall ensure that all persons designated to supervise drivers receive at least 60 minutes of training on alcohol misuse and receive at least an additional 60 minutes of training on controlled substances use. The training will be used by the supervisors to determine whether reasonable suspicion exists to require a driver to undergo testing under § 382.307. The training shall include the physical, behavioral, speech, and performance indicators of probable alcohol misuse and use of controlled substances. Recurrent training for supervisory personnel is not required.

Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) – 14 CFR Part 121 Append I & J

Drug Testing: Testing Based on Reasonable Cause. Each employer must test each employee who performs a safety-sensitive function and who is reasonably suspected of having used a prohibited drug. The decision to test must be based on a reasonable and articulable belief that the employee is using a prohibited drug on the basis of specific contemporaneous physical, behavioral, or performance indicators of probable drug use. At least two of the employee’s supervisors, one of whom is trained in detection of the symptoms of possible drug use, must substantiate and concur in the decision to test an employee who is reasonably suspected of drug use; except that in the case of an employer, other than a part 121 certificate holder, who employs 50 or fewer employees who perform safety-sensitive functions, one supervisor who is trained in detection of symptoms of possible drug use must substantiate the decision to test an employee who is reasonably suspected of drug use.

 

Alcohol Reasonable Suspicion Testing: 2. The employer’s determination that reasonable suspicion exists to require the covered employee to undergo an alcohol test shall be based on specific, contemporaneous, articulable observations concerning the appearance, behavior, speech or body odors of the employee. The required observations shall be made by a supervisor who is trained in detecting the symptoms of alcohol misuse. The supervisor who makes the determination that reasonable suspicion exists shall not conduct the breath alcohol test on that employee.

 

Federal Transit Administration (FTA) – 49 CFR 655

655.14 Education and training programs.

Each employer shall establish an employee education and training program for all covered employees, including:

(a) Education. The education component shall include display and distribution to every covered employee of: informational material and a community service hot-line telephone number for employee assistance, if available. (b) Training—(1) Covered employees. Covered employees must receive at least 60 minutes of training on the effects and consequences of prohibited drug use on personal health, safety, and the work environment, and on the signs and symptoms that may indicate prohibited drug use. (2) Supervisors. Supervisors and/or other company officers authorized by the employer to make reasonable suspicion determinations shall receive at least 60 minutes of training on the physical, behavioral, and performance indicators of probable drug use and at least 60 minutes of training on the physical, behavioral, speech, and performance indicators of probable alcohol misuse.

Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety administration (PHMSA)

Drug Testing: (d) Testing based on reasonable cause. Each operator shall drug test each employee when there is reasonable cause to believe the employee is using a prohibited drug. The decision to test must be based on a reasonable and articulable belief that the employee is using a prohibited drug on the basis of specific, contemporaneous physical, behavioral, or performance indicators of probable drug use. At least two of the employee’s supervisors, one of whom is trained in detection of the possible symptoms of drug use, shall substantiate and concur in the decision to test an employee. The concurrence between the two supervisors may be by telephone. However, in the case of operators with 50 or fewer employees subject to testing under this part, only one supervisor of the employee trained in detecting possible drug use symptoms shall substantiate the decision to test.

Alcohol Testing: §199.241  Training for supervisors. Each operator shall ensure that persons designated to determine whether reasonable suspicion exists to require a covered employee to undergo alcohol testing under §199.225(b) receive at least 60 minutes of training on the physical, behavioral, speech, and performance indicators of probable alcohol misuse.

U.S. Coast Guard (USCG) – §16.250   Reasonable cause testing requirements.

(a) The marine employer shall require any crewmember engaged or employed on board a vessel owned in the United States that is required by law or regulation to engage, employ or be operated by an individual holding a credential issued under this subchapter, who is reasonably suspected of using a dangerous drug to be chemically tested for dangerous drugs.

(b) The marine employer’s decision to test must be based on a reasonable and articulable belief that the individual has used a dangerous drug based on direct observation of specific, contemporaneous physical, behavioral, or performance indicators of probable use. Where practicable, this belief should be based on the observation of the individual by two persons in supervisory positions.

Supervisors must be given at least sixty minutes of training.

Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) – §219.300 Mandatory reasonable suspicion testing.

(a) Requirements. (1) A railroad must require a covered employee to submit to an alcohol test when the railroad has reasonable suspicion to believe that the employee has violated any prohibition of subpart B of this part concerning use of alcohol. The railroad’s determination that reasonable suspicion exists to require the covered employee to undergo an alcohol test must be based on specific, contemporaneous, articulable observations concerning the appearance, behavior, speech or body odors of the employee.

(2) A railroad must require a covered employee to submit to a drug test when the railroad has reasonable suspicion to believe that the employee has violated the prohibitions of subpart B of this part concerning use of controlled substances. The railroad’s determination that reasonable suspicion exists to require the covered employee to undergo a drug test must be based on specific, contemporaneous, articulable observations concerning the appearance, behavior, speech or body odors of the employee. Such observations may include indications of the chronic and withdrawal effects of drugs.

(b)(1) With respect to an alcohol test, the required observations must be made by a supervisor trained in accordance with §219.11(g). The supervisor who makes the determination that reasonable suspicion exists may not conduct testing on that employee.

(2) With respect to a drug test, the required observations must be made by two supervisors, at least one of whom is trained in accordance with §219.11(g).

AtHand Training provides awesome online training for DOT Supervisor for reasonable suspicion training.  

Use the buttons below to purchase and get compliant right now! 

credit cards accepted

 

 

 

Buy DOT Supervisor Course – $35

Buy DOT Employee Drug Awareness Course $10